If it's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that someone's beneficiary could not possibly have committed murder in order to gain their inheritance, does that mean they have an heir-tight alibi?
If it's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that someone's beneficiary could not possibly have committed murder in order to gain their inheritance, does that mean they have an heir-tight alibi?
“If it’s proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that someone’s beneficiary could not possibly have committed murder…”
It means he has a lawyer I can’t afford.
If you inherited your mother’s weaving equipment, would it be an heirloom loom, or a loom heirloom?
Just for that groaner…
Heh. Heh. You die now! :-)